NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
8128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
RTX A5000
+17256%
27.77 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
64
64
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GA102
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
