NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+732%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
16
64
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GF110
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
