NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
16320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+32668%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
100 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
