NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
19392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+102025%
163.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
19456
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
MI300
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
146 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
