NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
-
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G71
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Curie
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
Unknown
196 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
