NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
+6631%
6.664 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA107S
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
Unknown
144 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
