NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
7136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
A10M
+34885%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
56
32
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
