NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+11889%
8.033 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
