NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+14823%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
56
32
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
