NVIDIA Quadro CX vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3534%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro CX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
