NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 152W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+453%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
96bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
11
SM Count
-
352
Shading Units
1024
44
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
640 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
152W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
