NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
+2758%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
108
256
Shading Units
6912
32
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
