Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Boost Clock1440MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (165W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232
10.32 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +50%
15.56 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
256
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net