NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2550MHz vs 1670MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.3GB/s)
9600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
P102 101
10.69 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+510%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2018
Release Date
Aug 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
25
SM Count
100
3200
Shading Units
12800
200
TMUs
400
80
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
AD102
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
AD102
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
