NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
9632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+13520%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
76
96
Shading Units
9728
16
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
AD103
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
