NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD Radeon R7 A265
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
+163%
0.633 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
Opal
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
