NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
+1606%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
NVS Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
DG2-128
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
