Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V340

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro V340

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V340 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V340
10.75 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2018
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL (215-0894304)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net