Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock2475MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
+233%
35.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
4096
Shading Units
7168
256
TMUs
224
256
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
198.0 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
554.4 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
35.48 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.48 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
554.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
AD104-350-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
35.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
