Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XTX
+661%
81.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3300 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
6144
256
TMUs
384
256
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
633.6 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1267 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
162.2 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.10 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
355W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX+
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
57.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
