Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+141%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2019
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
