Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+1686%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
256
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
289W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
