Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 580

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 580

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 185W)
AMD Radeon RX 580 's Advantages
Boost Clock1340MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +72%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 580
6.175 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1257 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1340 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
144
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.88 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.175 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.175 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
385.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
185W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XTX (215-0910038)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net