Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD FirePro S9150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+110%
10.65 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
176
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
