Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Boost Clock1147MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210
+10%
11.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
4096
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
320
256
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
