Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 210W)
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2580MHz
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
RTX 4500 Ada Generation +272%
39.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
60
4096
Shading Units
7680
256
TMUs
240
256
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
210W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD103
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
45.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net