Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
M5x
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
-
Shading Units
9728
4
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M56
GPU Name
AD103
-
-
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
