Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1650MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.534 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+130%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Sep 2016
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
