Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1400MHz vs 1335MHz)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +154%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2022
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Integrated
Type
Professional
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
4GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
64bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy