Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 80EU and a Mobile platform GPU: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1594MHz vs 1300MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU +35%
1.664 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2020
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Integrated
Type
Mobile
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
2GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
64bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
20
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
52.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
3.328 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
1.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
416.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy