Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1215MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +3%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
5888
256
TMUs
184
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
80W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy