Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro P600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +1085%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P600 Mobile
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1430 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.92 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.88 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.44 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.88 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy