Intel Arctic Sound M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+13%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2022
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
