Intel Arc 140V vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V and 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (2200MHz vs 2050MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arc 140V
+4%
4.1 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
3.942 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2024
Release Date
Dec 2023
Battlemage
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
LPDDR5x
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
GB/s
Bandwidth
Render Config
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
24
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
0
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
65W
W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Variant
-
Xe2
Architecture
Xe-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12.2
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
