Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (2100MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
18688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+3332%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Dec 2023
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
192GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
19456
48
TMUs
1216
24
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
750W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
153 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
