Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +43%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Jul 2019
H3C Graphics
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy