Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+344%
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Sep 2008
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
768
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
182W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
