Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+210%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2011
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.716 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
