Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+357%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
43W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.627 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
