Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+2281%
2.381 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
H3C Graphics
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
