Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (159W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+441%
2.381 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
May 2007
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
159W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.72 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
