Intel H3C XG310 vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2400MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+622%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Oct 2022
H3C Graphics
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
2050 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.7 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
