Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FirePro V5800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (74W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+115%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
74W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Juniper
-
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.04 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
