NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+43373%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
1
3584
Shading Units
8
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
12W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G98
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
