NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1700MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
9.999 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+352%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Nov 2021
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
208
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
13312
224
TMUs
832
64
ROPs
0
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
Aldebaran
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
