NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1815MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000
+11%
11.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Aug 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
48
3584
Shading Units
3072
224
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
64
448
Tensor Cores
384
56
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
TU104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
