Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1038MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000 +85%
4.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy