NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+277%
8.637 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
GRID
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1536
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
95W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
