Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +508%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy