Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared a Mobile platform GPU: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and a Professional market GPU: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1477MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
6.05 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +143%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Mobile
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy